Behaviour-driven development of foundational uml components. Ioan Lazăr, Simona Motogna, and Bazil Pârv.Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Miesenberger, editors, HCI and Usability for e-Inclusion: 5th Symposium of the Workgroup Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Engineering of the Austrian Computer Society, USAB 2009, Linz, Austria, November 9-10, 2009 Proceedings, pages 416-427. Current state of agile user-centered design: A survey. groovy - a multi-faceted language for the java platform, 2018. Domain-driven design: Tackling complexity in the heart of software. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007. Multi-fidelity Prototyping of User Interfaces, pages 150-164. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning, pages 160-167, New York, NY, USA, 2008. A unified architecture for natural language processing: Deep neural networks with multitask learning. In 2011 37th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, pages 383-387, Washington, DC, USA, 2011. A study of the characteristics of behaviour driven development. Communicating design: Developing web site documentation for design and planning. Implementing domain-specific languages with Xtext and Xtend. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. boxcoxmix: Response Transformations for Random Effect and Variance Component Models, 2017. In addition, experiment as well as case study participants appreciated the sophisticated editor support of Slang. ![]() The findings of our experiments are supported by results from applying our approach in real-world scenarios. In addition to presenting the experiment's results, the paper elaborates on first experience from applying the approach in a large Swiss bank. The experiment showed that creating automatically executable test cases utilizing Slang takes 63% less time compared to the industry-proven tool JBehave. To quantify the economic advantage of our approach an AB/BA crossover designed experiment was conducted. The specification language Slang introduced by this paper generates automatically executable test cases from BDD-like feature descriptions that integrate low-fidelity prototypes in form of wireframesketcher models. Although industry-proven tools map test specifications automatically, test methods making test scripts executable need to be implemented manually. ![]() ![]() Behavior-driven test case design addresses this challenges by bringing requirement specifications and test cases closer together. In addition, test cases are perceived to be expensive to run and brittle, therefore causing a lot of false negative test results. Yet, creating graphical user interface test cases is considered expensive in comparison to unit or integration tests. To ensure high quality and expected behavior, those graphical user interfaces have to be tested thoroughly. The majority of users interacts with an application through its graphical user interface (GUI).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |